|
-: Avatars, Divinities :-
Shiva |
Nataraja |
Avatars of Vishnu |
Narasimha |
Ganesh | Krishna
Among Indian deities, perhaps none is as widely
worshipped, admired, and adored as Krishna [also
Krsna]. The worship of Krishna takes many forms,
and he is encountered in numerous distinct
regional traditions. The god Vishnu is most
commonly worshipped in his aspect as Rama and
Krishna, two of his ten incarnations; indeed, it
is no exaggeration to suggest that Rama and
Krishna have, in a manner of speaking,
superseded Vishnu himself. Where Rama is usually
and preeminently associated with the Ramayana,
Krishna has a rather more complex place in
Indian narrative traditions. He appears, of
course, in the Mahabharata, as the wise, some
might say cunning, counselor of the Pandavas,
whose timely and much-debated interventions in
the great war lead the Pandavas to victory; even
more memorably, perhaps, he appears as the
charioteer of the Pandava prince Arjuna, passing
down those teachings that got enshrined in the
part of the Mahabharata that came to be known as
the Bhagavad Gita. However, for a great many
Hindus, the preeminent text of Krishna worship
is the Bhagavata Purana, and most particularly
its Tenth Book, which recounts the childhood
exploits of Krishna, his adolescence, and his
life in Vrindavan and the Braj area amidst the
villagers, gopis [cowherdesses], and his
beloved, Radha.
Though one can speak of many Krishnas in the
Indian context, it is most productive to think
of Krishna as falling either within the
historical or mythical traditions of Indian
thought; within, in turn, each of these
traditions, one can speak of multiple
traditions. The historical Krishna is the
Krishna who is encountered in the Mahabharata,
and his stock rose considerably in the
nineteenth century with the advent of the Indian
nationalist movement. To understand the
resonance that the historical Krishna began to
have for educated, middle-class Indians, one can
do no better than to turn to the writings of
Bankimchandra Chatterji, the famous Bengali
novelist and essayist who also penned the
Krsnacaritra, or "The Life of Krishna". Bankim
asked himself the question that all educated
Indians at this time were pondering over, namely
how is it that India had, for innumerable
centuries, been enslaved by foreigners.
According to Bankim, the excessive devotionalism
of the Hindus had ill-prepared them to meet
foreign invasions, or even take an interest in
material life; the Hindus, he argued, had little
or no appetite for governance, and for centuries
they had neglected their social and political
institutions, preferring instead to be regaled
by stories of a god, Krishna, who appeared as a
naughty boy, lover, cowherd, trickster, playful
youngster, and even adulterer in Indian
literature and art. In the Bhagavata Purana, and
countless number of other Indian texts of
medieval devotionalism and secular literature
alike, the exploits of Krishna as the "butter
thief", the simultaneous lover of 16,000 gopis
or nubile young women, the man-about-town who
frolics on the village green, the toddler who
eats mud but is recognized by his mother as the
Supreme Being, and the initiator of the rasa
lila, or cosmic dance are recounted,
celebrated, and interpreted with evident
delight. It is this Krishna who has ever
predominated in the Indian tradition, to whom
paeans were sung by the bhakta or devotional
poets, over whom the great Mirabai went mad, and
who furnished Indian artists and musicians with
the material from which they drew their
sustenance.
Bankim traced this devotionalism in Bengal to
the piety of Sri Caitanya and other Vaishnavas,
who had made a cult of Krishna worship, and it
was a matter of acute embarrassment to him that
as a candidate for a Hindu deity, Hindus could
do no better than put forth a god who would have
been considered intolerable in the Semitic
religions. Hinduism had no place in the modern
world, Bankim appeared to suggest, as it was a
largely unregulated, polycentric, and
ahistorical religion; it had no conception of a
single book, or a single prophet, and its
deities, such as Krishna, were scarcely the kind
of models that Muhammad and Jesus were for Islam
and Christianity, respectively. What kind of
religion was it that humored its devotees by
presenting them with a deity whose amusements
consisted in stealing womens clothes while they
bathed in the river, dallying with women under
the moonlight, or exchanging roles with his
beloved, Radha? Yet Bankim was certain that, had
Indians not been indifferent to their own
history, they would have been aware of the
other, historical Krishna who had once reigned
supreme in the Indian tradition. This Krishna
counseled Arjuna to fight and fulfill his duties
as a warrior; this Krishna, though not taking up
arms himself, led the Pandavas to victory, and
so paved the way for the rejuvenation of Bharat
[India]. Bankim, and other Indian nationalists
of his ilk, thus took it as their mandate to
resuscitate the historical Krishna, turn Krishna
into a historical figure in the manner of Christ
and Muhammad, and transform Hinduism into a
world historical religion. Bankims near
contemporary, the Maharashtrian political leader
Bal Gangadar Tilak, similarly argued for a
reading of the Gita that stressed not merely the
contemporaneity of the text, but which evoked
the image of a Krishna who could inspire
nationalists to the fulfillment of their task of
evicting the British from India.
Yes, as I have already suggested, the Krishna
whose life and exploits fills the many pages of
Indian literature is much less the Krishna of
the Gita and the Mahabharata than the Krishna of
the Bhagavatam, Mirabai, and Surdas, and the
musicians and artists exemplified by the
master miniature painters -- of India have drawn
largely upon the playful lover and God for their
inspiration. Krishna has, outside the realm of
his devotees, most commonly been considered from
the standpoint of religion and art history, the
two academic disciplines which have been most
concerned with representations of Krishna in
Indian tradition, but he can also be viewed from
the standpoint of history, politics, and
cultural and social anthropology. The study of
Krishna raises complex questions: how might one,
for example, write the biography of an Indian
deity? Some scholarly studies have attempted to
view Krishna in relation to other Indian
deities, as well as in relation to the prophets
and saviors of other religions; others have
attempted to draw a portrait of the historical
and spiritual landscapes that inform Krishnas
biography: these include the towns of Vrindavan,
Mathura, and other neighboring areas in the
region of Braj, other pilgrimage towns
associated with Krishna worship, such as
Nathdwara, Dwarka, Puri, and Kurukshetra, and
the eternal lands where Krishna partook of the
rasa lila. Recent anthropological perspectives
have focussed not only on divergent traditions
of Krishna worship in India, but also on modern
forms of Krishna devotionalism, such as those
which are embodied in the Hare Krsna movement. |